A quick google search will show you that Jones started as many games as the “raw” quarterback prospect in this draft, Trey Lance. Arguments for Jones center around him being the most accurate thanks to his completion percentage or that Jones is pro-ready since he started at Alabama. Jones is going to be a valuable starter in the NFL, and it wouldn’t surprise me if he ended up as a guy who wins playoff games in the league. When you watch Jones play, it’s evident that he’s obnoxiously accurate and knows where to go with the football. What is this based on? Yes, Jones received rave reviews, and, to paraphrase, one GM said he’s a borderline football savant. Let’s talk about the labels from the three quarterbacks in the running for the No. Fast forward a couple of months later, and that’s how you end up with a cesspool of regurgitated takes that are on an endless loop around the internet. Someone hears one pundit say something about a player and, without hesitation, repeats it as fact. The part about these labels that gets me is the lack of critical thinking. ![]() Whether you’re a defensive end that isn’t athletic enough to bend the edge around an offensive tackle or one of the seven wide receivers who didn’t run a sub 4.4 40-yard dash this cycle, you’re going under a category. ![]() Every year during the draft process, players get labeled.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |